Know which AI projects are worth starting, before you start them.
What’s included
- Readiness assessment
- Use case roadmap
- Architecture review
- Governance
2 wks
from the first call to a costed, sequenced roadmap
Yours
every document we produce, whoever builds it afterwards
What we deliver
An independent read on where AI will actually pay for itself in your organisation, delivered as a costed, sequenced roadmap your board can approve or decline on the evidence.
AI readiness assessment
An honest read on your data, systems, security posture and team, and what each one has to change before an AI project can succeed.
Use case discovery and scoring
Workshops with the people doing the work, then every candidate scored on value, feasibility and risk, so the running order is argued rather than assumed.
Architecture and build-or-buy review
Whether to buy a product, extend a platform you already pay for, or build something of your own. We say buy whenever buying wins.
Governance and risk framework
Approval gates, human oversight, model and data policies, and an audit trail your risk committee can actually read.
Proof of value design
A pilot with a success threshold and a stop condition agreed before it starts, so it ends in a decision rather than another demo.
Team enablement
Workshops and written standards so your own engineers can carry the work, instead of depending on an agency forever.
Advice from people who ship.
We are an engineering studio first. Every recommendation here comes from building and operating these systems in production, not from a slide library.
Technologies we use
- OpenAI
- Anthropic
- Google Gemini
- Azure AI Foundry
- AWS Bedrock
- Open-weight models
- LangGraph
- Model Context Protocol
A roadmap with prices on it
Each use case carries a cost estimate, an effort band and a payback case, so the decision in front of your board is a business one.
Risks named early, in writing
Data gaps, integration blockers, regulatory exposure and the things that simply will not work. Named in the first fortnight, not discovered in the sixth month.
No obligation to build with us
The assessment stands on its own and is written so your in-house team or another supplier can act on it.
The recommendation that fits
Including buying a product rather than building one, and including not running the project at all. A rules engine is often cheaper, faster and more predictable than a model.
How a consultancy engagement runs
01
Frame
We agree the question the engagement has to answer, and what a useful answer looks like.
02
Assess
Interviews with the people doing the work, a read of your systems and data, and a security and compliance check.
03
Prioritise
Every candidate use case scored on value, feasibility and risk, then sequenced into a plan.
04
Report
A costed roadmap, an architecture recommendation and the risks, presented to your team and your board.
05
Decide
You choose what happens next. If you want it built, the roadmap becomes the statement of work.
Related case studies
- 0data sent outside
- Fintech
- Private LLM
A private knowledge assistant that never leaves the building
Cited answers from thousands of internal policy documents, served entirely on internal infrastructure.
Read the case study - Citedofficial guidance
- Public services
- AI Product
An immigration guide that turns complex rules into clear next steps
An eligibility engine with AI explanations grounded in official guidance.
Read the case study
Enterprise AI consultancy: common questions
Straight answers to what we are asked most often.
A written assessment, a scored and sequenced use case roadmap with cost and effort bands, an architecture and build-or-buy recommendation, and a risk and governance section. It is yours to keep and to share with anyone.
No. The assessment is priced and delivered on its own, and it is written so another team can act on it. If you do want us to build, the roadmap becomes the basis of the statement of work.
Two weeks for a focused question, such as one department or one process. Four to six weeks where the scope covers several business units or a regulated environment.
Where that is the answer, yes. A rules engine, a fixed integration or a change to the process itself is often cheaper, faster and more predictable, and we would rather say so than sell you a model.
Yes, and we prefer it. Most engagements run with your own engineers and process owners in the room, which is also the fastest way for the knowledge to stay with you.
Explore related services
Related service
AI Agents & Automation
Autonomous agents and AI workflows that answer customers, update your systems and remove hours of manual work every week. Evaluated, secured and monitored like any other critical system.
Learn moreRelated service
Generative AI & LLM Solutions
Knowledge assistants, AI copilots and LLM features built into your product, grounded in your own data with a citation on every answer.
Learn moreRelated service
Cloud & DevOps
Cloud architecture, managed hosting, CI/CD and MLOps that keep your products fast, secure and affordable as usage grows.
Learn more